<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution and the Pulpit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://CafeInspirado.com/20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://CafeInspirado.com/20</link>
	<description>thoughts on living la vida inspirada ... the inspired life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: barb</title>
		<link>http://CafeInspirado.com/20/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafeinspirado.com/?p=20#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I hear you and agree 100%. (Who woulda thunk it?) I am continually wondering why many mainstream believers think that critical thinking and Christianity are mutually exclusive. I scoff at anyone -- and any organization -- that claim to understand all the operational and implementational principles of the Universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you and agree 100%. (Who woulda thunk it?) I am continually wondering why many mainstream believers think that critical thinking and Christianity are mutually exclusive. I scoff at anyone &#8212; and any organization &#8212; that claim to understand all the operational and implementational principles of the Universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://CafeInspirado.com/20/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafeinspirado.com/?p=20#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Well said. I&#039;m a believer that the formation of this world was not a random event; even Big Bang theorists admit that their model can explain only what happened from the instant *after* the bang and not its cause. As such, I see no plausible reason why belief in such a model should be mutually exclusive from belief in God&#039;s involvement in this world&#039;s creation.

As for young earth, I haven&#039;t believed in that for quite some time. My view of &quot;intelligent design&quot; is that God may very well have overseen the development of living organisms but allowed it to take place over many thousands of millennia, as fossilised evidence has indicated.

Ultimately, a belief in young earth creationism will have little or no bearing on whether or not a person has found their way to God, opened themselves to the touch of the Holy Spirit and following the path of Christ. And this, surely, should be our concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I&#8217;m a believer that the formation of this world was not a random event; even Big Bang theorists admit that their model can explain only what happened from the instant *after* the bang and not its cause. As such, I see no plausible reason why belief in such a model should be mutually exclusive from belief in God&#8217;s involvement in this world&#8217;s creation.</p>
<p>As for young earth, I haven&#8217;t believed in that for quite some time. My view of &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; is that God may very well have overseen the development of living organisms but allowed it to take place over many thousands of millennia, as fossilised evidence has indicated.</p>
<p>Ultimately, a belief in young earth creationism will have little or no bearing on whether or not a person has found their way to God, opened themselves to the touch of the Holy Spirit and following the path of Christ. And this, surely, should be our concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

